Watch out for those who sneer at the new king kong - King Kong Reviews

As I read the reviews of people who sneer at the new King Kong movie, I am seeing complaints based more on personal biases than on realistic cinematic comments. I suspect that many of them are people who are upset by the surge of science fiction and fantasy into the mainstream of big Hollywood films and fiction in general. Listen carefully to their complaints. You will find things like "the storyline was unbelievable." It is a fantasy -- of course the story line is unbelievable. To watch sci fi and fantasy you have to be able to "suspend disbelief" as psychologists would say. Many reviewers, both professional and public, were enraged that The Lord of the Rings received any praise or recognition. They felt that the "fantasy" stuff was only fit for children and could never be more than a "B" movie. One reviewer of King Kong complained about Jackson trying to "make an epic out of his material." First of all, the original is considered an epic, today. Secondly, I doubt that this reviewer would be happy with any film that is not rooted in reality. There are many people like this. Another sneering reviewer stated that the line, ?It wasn?t the airplanes, it was beauty that killed the beast.? ?. . . could have been written by an emotionally retarded third grader.? Actually, it is a direct quote from the original film. Others complained that there was a slow start to the picture. It is called ?character development? which is something we do not see a great deal of in many modern films. I guess that they would not be happy unless there is blood spurting and a decapitation or two in the first few minutes of the film. For those of you who hope that Hollywood?s new emphasis on fantasy films will simply go away, I have some bad news. As a schoolteacher of 28 years, I have watched as the younger generations have become increasingly committed to this genre of entertainment. It is not going to go away no matter how much you dislike it or sneer at it. I also feel sorry for you if you cannot "suspend disbelief" like the rest of us. It makes for a much more amazing world to live in when you can. To those of you with open minds, go see this film. It is wonderful on every level. It is a faithful tribute to the original that expands on it characters, storyline, and visuals. As for those of you who hate sci fi and fantasy, go see some dark, depressing, realistic film that reconfirms your view of life. Those of us who can step into these magical worlds intend to enjoy life to the fullest

Sittin' on top of the world - King Kong Reviews

I am a true blue fan of the 1933 original. And now I'd just like to say "Thank You, Peter Jackson, for improving on an all-time classic film." In fact, this version closely resembles the original, only it's more fleshed out, the characters aren't one dimensional stereotypes, and now, Anne Darrow (Naomi Watts takes over for the original Scream Queen of Cinema, Fay Wray with far more pathos and motivation) has a part that is so fleshed out that you actually understand why Kong goes to the lengths he does just for her. The movie is neatly divided into three equally fantastic parts: 1)The Setup 2) Skull Island (this part of the film makes Jurassic Park look as if it were directed by Ed Wood) and 3)Back to the Big Apple, on top of the Empire State Building in the famous, final, iconic scene for the ages. Peter Jackson got absolutely EVERYTHING right, and this movie is just about perfect. KING KONG officially ushers the world of film into this new millenium we live in with high hopes for the future of cinema. He deserves another Best Director Oscar for this one!

Stupid story + award-winning director = ? - King Kong Reviews

What do you get when you mix an outrageousy ridiculous story with a loaded, well-known, award-winning director? Well folks, see this film and you'll see what I'm talking about. Ever since he saw it at age 9, Peter Jackson has dreamt of doing a remake of King Kong. I've even heard that Lord of the Rings was just a practice for the effects he was planning to use in the film. So why wasn't Kong perfect? If Jackson had so much time to plan out this film, then why is everyone slamming it? I'm afraid it's the story, my friends. A giant ape and a human woman falling deeply in love; sounds like a joke, doesn't it? And that's exactly what many of the past Kong movies have been. A waste of time. But I'm grateful that Peter Jackson decided to remake this film. Jackson made an obscene story actually become somewhat believeable. There are some great scenes of the woman and the ape getting to know eachother...and...(It's hard to say this without cracking a smile)...Falling in love. But don't worry, this isn't a sappy love movie. I have to say, this is one of the most action packed movies I've seen this year, not to mention, amazing effects. King Kong's facial expressions were almost perfect. And for a second, I thought Peter Jackson's camera men actually went back in time to film real dinosaurs. The actors worked pretty well with the green screen effects too. For example, Kong fights, climbs, and runs with Ann Darrow in his hands, and although the actress is really doing this all in front of a green screen, she acts as if she's really face to face with a giant ape. During the first half hour of this film, I was extremely bored. My friends and I were seated in the front row, because the theater was so crowed, and in the begining of the film, I actually stopped looking at the screen for about 20 minutes because my neck hurt and it was boring. But every second after that was pure action. There's an amazing scene where Kong fights three T-Rex's with one hand, while holding Ann Darrow safely in the other. There's also a disgustingly satisfying bug scene. Some of the crew members fall into a cavern, and giant bugs come out and try to eat them. Yeah, it sounds stupid. But it's awesome. People in the auidence were continously shreaking and "Eww"ing. Alright, I really gotta stop typing so much. I'll just cut to the chase...I read other reviews, and I've considered some other peoples opinions...Here's what they think. People Who Liked the Movie Said: "Peter Jackson's King Kong is 200,000 kilowatt jolt through the skull. He blindsides you with images and thoughts and feelings that when you leave, you have to take a moment and reflect." - erico_77375 "It's scary when it needs to be, it's funny when it needs to be, it doesn't miss a beat, the story is classic, and it's got great visuals to boot!" - nateman1023 People Who Didn't like the Movie Said: "Jackson once again decides to leave nothing for the viewer's own imagination. He persists in using every last inch of film that he has shot, and much like his previous film efforts, proves that he still doesn't know what an editor is for." - naplesdave1974 "Characters were put in ridiculous situations and survived against impossible odds." - cferg88218 Basically, what I'm trying to say is, King Kong is a silly story, but Peter Jackon has definately done the best version so far.

This movie frickin rocked. - King Kong Reviews

This was an awesome movie. I don't know about the moron who wrote a 2000 word review and gave the whole movie away and then said that people weren't intelligent or patient enough to appreciate it. You can be 15, 50 or 100 and appreciate this film. I am 37. I took my 13 year old daughter and my 65 year old father and they both loved it. A movie that can draw generations together like that has to be great. This movie had spectacular effects. All I can say is that you will not be disappointed. It was great!

Was it really that long? - King Kong Reviews

Maybe people are impatient or what not, but I thought this movie was perfectly put together. The long and lagging moments weren't boring because I anticipated something afterwards and something big would always happen. I would say this is a pretty good remake of a movie and I'm sad to say that it won't be doing big in the box offices even though it should. I was one of those people who saw the preview the first time and said, "That looks dumb." I actually got dragged to the movie by some friends and in return, came out of the movie happy that I saw it. Look at the ratings and don't believe those who gave it F's. The average right now is an A- which is high for ANY movie.

Kong is king - King Kong Reviews

This is one movie that is worth more than the price of a ticket. It is engaging, dramatic, exciting, romantic and heartbreaking all at once. Peter Jackson had done it again, his Kong is a marvel of visuals and emotions and his actors are exceptionally suited to their roles. The beautiful Naomi Watts is a standout besides Jack Black but nonetheless the star is the CGI Kong himself. Spectacular action and romance that is Kong-sized, there is no doubt that both Jackson and Kong is King.

Beyond words! - King Kong Reviews

Definitly the best movie of the year. Incredible special effects, great direction, and good acting all around. I would say that this movie is probably worth seeing at least twice in theatres. Great adventure movie for all people......well....maybe not little ones under the age of 7yr. There are some creepy scenes that may frighten them. The film does a good job in making you feel all characters and special effect characters real. The movie also does a good job in hitting on your emotions as well. There are frightening times, funny times, and times for crying. ......ps. The scenes with dinosuars is amazing and just has you griping to your seat!!!!!